<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Effect of Fruit Bagging on the Development and Quality of Guava Fruit</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.02.108</doi>
  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>Guava (Psidium guajava L.) is highly nutritious, and contains significant minerals, vitamins,<br />
and dietary fibre, which makes it effective for treating stomach-related issues. Fruit quality is<br />
influenced by biotic and abiotic factors, with external appearance being crucial. Agronomic practices<br />
can improve the fruit microenvironment, enhancing quality and market value. Thus, producing high-<br />
quality, defect-free, and chemical-free fruits is essential. The present experiment studied the effect of<br />
bagging on the development and quality of guava variety Lalit. Bagging at marble and egg stages<br />
used various materials: control (no bagging), newspaper, butter paper, and different colored non-<br />
woven bags. Bagging improved physicochemical parameters compared to unbagged fruits. The egg<br />
stage bagging recorded maximum fruit weight (134.79 g), fruit length (6.07 cm), fruit diameter (6.43<br />
cm), fruit volume (133.99 ml), fruit retention (96.11%), number of fruits per tree (28.83), yield per<br />
tree (3.95 kg), shelf life (6.73 days), TSS (11.83 °Brix), reducing sugars (6.48%), total sugars<br />
(8.32%), ascorbic acid (170.66 mg/100 g pulp), minimum PLW (7.34%), and titratable acidity<br />
(0.55%). Among bagging materials, the non-woven red bag yielded the highest fruit weight (137.13<br />
g), fruit length (6.22 cm), fruit diameter (6.53 cm), fruit volume (138.81 ml), fruit retention (97.22%),<br />
number of fruits per tree (29.17), yield per tree (4.12 kg), shelf life (7.00 days), TSS (12.07 °Brix),<br />
reducing sugars (6.61%), total sugars (8.56%), non-reducing sugars (1.95%), ascorbic acid (173.46<br />
mg/100 g pulp), and minimum days required for harvesting and physiological weight loss (7.04%).<br />
Conversely, the newspaper bag showed the lowest titratable acidity (0.52%). Bagged fruits had fewer<br />
fruit fly infestations and higher marketability. No significant differences were observed in physical<br />
and quality attributes across various stages and bagging materials.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.02.108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.02.108</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>Guava (Psidium guajava L.) is highly nutritious, and contains significant minerals, vitamins,<br />
and dietary fibre, which makes it effective for treating stomach-related issues. Fruit quality is<br />
influenced by biotic and abiotic factors, with external appearance being crucial. Agronomic practices<br />
can improve the fruit microenvironment, enhancing quality and market value. Thus, producing high-<br />
quality, defect-free, and chemical-free fruits is essential. The present experiment studied the effect of<br />
bagging on the development and quality of guava variety Lalit. Bagging at marble and egg stages<br />
used various materials: control (no bagging), newspaper, butter paper, and different colored non-<br />
woven bags. Bagging improved physicochemical parameters compared to unbagged fruits. The egg<br />
stage bagging recorded maximum fruit weight (134.79 g), fruit length (6.07 cm), fruit diameter (6.43<br />
cm), fruit volume (133.99 ml), fruit retention (96.11%), number of fruits per tree (28.83), yield per<br />
tree (3.95 kg), shelf life (6.73 days), TSS (11.83 °Brix), reducing sugars (6.48%), total sugars<br />
(8.32%), ascorbic acid (170.66 mg/100 g pulp), minimum PLW (7.34%), and titratable acidity<br />
(0.55%). Among bagging materials, the non-woven red bag yielded the highest fruit weight (137.13<br />
g), fruit length (6.22 cm), fruit diameter (6.53 cm), fruit volume (138.81 ml), fruit retention (97.22%),<br />
number of fruits per tree (29.17), yield per tree (4.12 kg), shelf life (7.00 days), TSS (12.07 °Brix),<br />
reducing sugars (6.61%), total sugars (8.56%), non-reducing sugars (1.95%), ascorbic acid (173.46<br />
mg/100 g pulp), and minimum days required for harvesting and physiological weight loss (7.04%).<br />
Conversely, the newspaper bag showed the lowest titratable acidity (0.52%). Bagged fruits had fewer<br />
fruit fly infestations and higher marketability. No significant differences were observed in physical<br />
and quality attributes across various stages and bagging materials.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Effect-of-Fruit-Bagging-on-the-Development-and-Quality-of-Guava-Fruit.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>]]></body>
</article>
