<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Effect of Irrigation and Fertigation Levels on Growth andYield of Chilli [Capsicum annuumL.]</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.03.84</doi>
  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>The present investigation was conducted at All India Coordinated Research<br />
Project on Vegetable Crops, Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi<br />
Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar during summer and late kharif 2018-19.<br />
The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications and<br />
sixteen treatment combinations, which comprises four levels of irrigation viz., I 1 -0.7ETc,<br />
I 2 -0.8 ET C , I 3 -0.9 ET C and I 4 -1.0ETc by drip irrigation as main plot treatments and four<br />
levels of fertigation viz., F 1 -125, F 2 -100, F 3 -75 and F 4 -50 % of RDF through WSF as sub-<br />
plot treatments. The control treatment (I 5 ) i.e. surface irrigation with 100 % RDF through<br />
conventional fertilizers. The results indicated that the irrigation level I 2 -0.8 Etc as well as<br />
fertigation level F 2 -100% RDF through WSF showed significantly better growth<br />
attributes viz., plant height, number of primary branches plant -1 and plant spread compared<br />
to the rest of the levels of drip irrigation and fertigation as well as control, during both the<br />
season of experimentation and in pooled results.<br />
As concerned with flowering characteristics, the control treatment noticed early<br />
days to 50 % flowering than the rest of the levels of drip irrigation and fertigation.<br />
Whereas irrigation levels showed significant variation in respect days to 50 % flowering,<br />
the irrigation levelI 1 -0.7ETcregistered minimum days to 50 % flowering while maximum<br />
days to 50 % flowering was observed under I 4 -1.0ETcirrigation regime, while the<br />
fertigation level F 1 -125% RDF through WSF recorded significantly minimum number of<br />
days to 50 % flowering during both the season under study and also reflected same trend<br />
in pooled results.<br />
Scheduling of irrigation through drip irrigation at 0.8 ETc irrigation level along<br />
with fertigation level F 2 -100 % RDF through WSF recorded significant maximum fruit<br />
length, fruit diameter, and average weight of fruit over rest of the levels of drip irrigation<br />
and fertigation as well as control, during both the season and in pooled results.<br />
Application of irrigation at 0.8Etc level coupled with fertigation level F 2 -100%<br />
RDF through WSF recorded significantly maximum yield plant -1 (444.49, 953.67, and<br />
699.08 g, respectively), yield plot -1 (14.22, 30.52 and 22.37 kg, respectively) and total<br />
yield hectare -1 (123.47, 264.91 and 194.19 q, respectively). However, challenges<br />
include understanding the specific needs of different chili varieties and soil types,<br />
ensuring equitable water and fertilizer distribution, and overcoming logistical barriers in<br />
remote areas.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Original Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.03.84" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.03.84</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>The present investigation was conducted at All India Coordinated Research<br />
Project on Vegetable Crops, Department of Horticulture, Mahatma Phule Krishi<br />
Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Dist. Ahmednagar during summer and late kharif 2018-19.<br />
The experiment was laid out in split plot design with three replications and<br />
sixteen treatment combinations, which comprises four levels of irrigation viz., I 1 -0.7ETc,<br />
I 2 -0.8 ET C , I 3 -0.9 ET C and I 4 -1.0ETc by drip irrigation as main plot treatments and four<br />
levels of fertigation viz., F 1 -125, F 2 -100, F 3 -75 and F 4 -50 % of RDF through WSF as sub-<br />
plot treatments. The control treatment (I 5 ) i.e. surface irrigation with 100 % RDF through<br />
conventional fertilizers. The results indicated that the irrigation level I 2 -0.8 Etc as well as<br />
fertigation level F 2 -100% RDF through WSF showed significantly better growth<br />
attributes viz., plant height, number of primary branches plant -1 and plant spread compared<br />
to the rest of the levels of drip irrigation and fertigation as well as control, during both the<br />
season of experimentation and in pooled results.<br />
As concerned with flowering characteristics, the control treatment noticed early<br />
days to 50 % flowering than the rest of the levels of drip irrigation and fertigation.<br />
Whereas irrigation levels showed significant variation in respect days to 50 % flowering,<br />
the irrigation levelI 1 -0.7ETcregistered minimum days to 50 % flowering while maximum<br />
days to 50 % flowering was observed under I 4 -1.0ETcirrigation regime, while the<br />
fertigation level F 1 -125% RDF through WSF recorded significantly minimum number of<br />
days to 50 % flowering during both the season under study and also reflected same trend<br />
in pooled results.<br />
Scheduling of irrigation through drip irrigation at 0.8 ETc irrigation level along<br />
with fertigation level F 2 -100 % RDF through WSF recorded significant maximum fruit<br />
length, fruit diameter, and average weight of fruit over rest of the levels of drip irrigation<br />
and fertigation as well as control, during both the season and in pooled results.<br />
Application of irrigation at 0.8Etc level coupled with fertigation level F 2 -100%<br />
RDF through WSF recorded significantly maximum yield plant -1 (444.49, 953.67, and<br />
699.08 g, respectively), yield plot -1 (14.22, 30.52 and 22.37 kg, respectively) and total<br />
yield hectare -1 (123.47, 264.91 and 194.19 q, respectively). However, challenges<br />
include understanding the specific needs of different chili varieties and soil types,<br />
ensuring equitable water and fertilizer distribution, and overcoming logistical barriers in<br />
remote areas.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Effect-of-Irrigation-and-Fertigation-Levels-on-Growth-and-Yield-of-Chilli-Capsicum-annuumL.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>]]></body>
</article>
