<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Farmers&#8217; perception and adoption behavior of Agricultural machineries – An&lt;br&gt;Empirical Evidence from Cauvery Delta Tamil Nadu</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.629</doi>
  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>The study aimed to explore the agricultural machineries usage behavior and its direct and<br />
indirect effects on livelihood of the delta farmers in Cauvery river region of Tamil Nadu. Four<br />
villages namely, Pullavarayan kudikaadu, Idamelaiyur, Vaduvoor and Saathanur from Thiruvarur<br />
district of Tamil Nadu have been selected based on land distribution and intensive agriculture.<br />
The household survey was held in all the four villages. Based on the secondary data, the villages<br />
were identified. Around 104 voluntary farm households were surveyed. The study found that,<br />
because of Cauvery canal and availability of three phase current supply, majority of the<br />
households relies on agriculture for their livelihood. The farm families that earn supplementary<br />
income excluding animal rearing are above 90.00 %. About 22.50 % of the farm households are<br />
collegiate, meagre proportion (5.62 %) of the farm Households leased out their land due to<br />
ageing, migrated children and to preferentially allocate more time for their non-farm jobs. The<br />
most prominent agricultural machineries used by the samples either by owning or through rent<br />
are, Combined harvester (96.92%), Tractor (96.92%), Straw Baler (90.81%) Hand Sprayer<br />
(76.53) and Rice Transplanter (70.40%). The cost savings using agricultural machineries over<br />
traditional cultivation method as perceived by the respondents were, less than 25000 rupees<br />
(48.97%), more than 25000 to 1 lakh rupees (40.81%) and more than 1 lakh rupees (10.20%).<br />
Even though agricultural machineries proven economic benefit on field level, farmers are yet to<br />
be convinced fully on its adoption this might be due to several insightful field level usage and<br />
access problems.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Original Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.629" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.629</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>The study aimed to explore the agricultural machineries usage behavior and its direct and<br />
indirect effects on livelihood of the delta farmers in Cauvery river region of Tamil Nadu. Four<br />
villages namely, Pullavarayan kudikaadu, Idamelaiyur, Vaduvoor and Saathanur from Thiruvarur<br />
district of Tamil Nadu have been selected based on land distribution and intensive agriculture.<br />
The household survey was held in all the four villages. Based on the secondary data, the villages<br />
were identified. Around 104 voluntary farm households were surveyed. The study found that,<br />
because of Cauvery canal and availability of three phase current supply, majority of the<br />
households relies on agriculture for their livelihood. The farm families that earn supplementary<br />
income excluding animal rearing are above 90.00 %. About 22.50 % of the farm households are<br />
collegiate, meagre proportion (5.62 %) of the farm Households leased out their land due to<br />
ageing, migrated children and to preferentially allocate more time for their non-farm jobs. The<br />
most prominent agricultural machineries used by the samples either by owning or through rent<br />
are, Combined harvester (96.92%), Tractor (96.92%), Straw Baler (90.81%) Hand Sprayer<br />
(76.53) and Rice Transplanter (70.40%). The cost savings using agricultural machineries over<br />
traditional cultivation method as perceived by the respondents were, less than 25000 rupees<br />
(48.97%), more than 25000 to 1 lakh rupees (40.81%) and more than 1 lakh rupees (10.20%).<br />
Even though agricultural machineries proven economic benefit on field level, farmers are yet to<br />
be convinced fully on its adoption this might be due to several insightful field level usage and<br />
access problems.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Farmers-perception-and-adoption-behavior-of-Agricultural-machineries.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>]]></body>
</article>
