<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Impact of integrated nutrient management on mustard productivity and soil fertility in a long-term rice–mustard cropping system</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.04.178</doi>
  
  <authors>
          <author>
        <name>Vikram Bharati</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-9769</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name>R.S. Singh</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name> Meka Shivaram Reddy</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name> S. S. Prasad</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name>Brijesh Kumar</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name> C.S.Choudhary</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name> Rajendra Prasad</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name> Amrendra Kumar</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
          <author>
        <name>H.C. Chaudhary</name>
                  <orcid>https://orcid.org/register</orcid>
              </author>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>Rice–mustard cropping systems dominate large tracts of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, playing a crucial role in food and nutritional security. However, intensive cultivation without adequate nutrient replenishment has led to declining soil fertility and stagnating crop yields. Despite the known beneits of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM), long-term empirical evidence assessing its sustainability in rice–mustard systems is limited, particularly in the alluvial soils of eastern India. Addressing this gap is vital for developing speciic nutrient strategies that enhance productivity while preserving soil health. This study aimed to evaluate the longterm effects of INM on mustard yield, soil fertility, and system sustainability in a rice–mustard cropping system. A ten-year ield experiment was conducted at TCA, Dholi, Bihar. The experiment consisted of ten nutrient management treatments, including control, varying levels of NPK fertilizers, combinations with secondary and micronutrients (S, Zn, B) and the inclusion of organic manure -1 (FYM @ 2.5 t ha ), laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. Results revealed signiicant differences among treatments in terms of growth, yield and economic returns of mustard. The treatment T4 (150% NPK) recorded the higher seed yield -1 -1 (1870 kg ha ), net returns (₹141578ha ) and beneit–cost ratio (1.43), which were statistically at par with T8 (100% NPK + FYM @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹), followed by treatments supplemented with micronutrients. Long-term INM application enhanced soil fertility, with the highest organic carbon (0.50%) recorded under 100% NPK + FYM treatment. Integrated nutrient management proves to be a sustainable strategy for enhancing mustard yield, proitability, and soil health in the intensive rice–mustard system of alluvial soils</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Original Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-authors-wrap"><span class="aatcc-author-item">Vikram Bharati<sup>1</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0101-9769" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item">R.S. Singh<sup>1</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item"> Meka Shivaram Reddy<sup>1</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item"> S. S. Prasad<sup>3</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item">Brijesh Kumar<sup>2</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item"> C.S.Choudhary<sup>3</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item"> Rajendra Prasad<sup>1</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item"> Amrendra Kumar<sup>1</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span> <span class="aatcc-author-item">H.C. Chaudhary<sup>3</sup><a href="https://orcid.org/register" target="_blank">
                    <img decoding="async" src="https://orcid.org/sites/default/files/images/orcid_16x16.png" class="aatcc-orcid-icon">
                </a></span></div><div class="aatcc-affiliations-wrap"><div class="aatcc-affiliation-item">
                        <sup>1</sup> Department of Agronomy, Dr. RPCAU, Pusa Bihar 848 125, India
                    </div><div class="aatcc-affiliation-item">
                        <sup>2</sup> Department of Soil Science, Dr. RPCAU, Pusa Bihar 848125, India 
                    </div><div class="aatcc-affiliation-item">
                        <sup>3</sup> Department of Plant Pathology, Dr. RPCAU, Pusa Bihar 848125, India
                    </div></div><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.04.178" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.04.178</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>Rice–mustard cropping systems dominate large tracts of the Indo-Gangetic Plains, playing a crucial role in food and nutritional security. However, intensive cultivation without adequate nutrient replenishment has led to declining soil fertility and stagnating crop yields. Despite the known beneits of Integrated Nutrient Management (INM), long-term empirical evidence assessing its sustainability in rice–mustard systems is limited, particularly in the alluvial soils of eastern India. Addressing this gap is vital for developing speciic nutrient strategies that enhance productivity while preserving soil health. This study aimed to evaluate the longterm effects of INM on mustard yield, soil fertility, and system sustainability in a rice–mustard cropping system. A ten-year ield experiment was conducted at TCA, Dholi, Bihar. The experiment consisted of ten nutrient management treatments, including control, varying levels of NPK fertilizers, combinations with secondary and micronutrients (S, Zn, B) and the inclusion of organic manure -1 (FYM @ 2.5 t ha ), laid out in a randomized block design with three replications. Results revealed signiicant differences among treatments in terms of growth, yield and economic returns of mustard. The treatment T4 (150% NPK) recorded the higher seed yield -1 -1 (1870 kg ha ), net returns (₹141578ha ) and beneit–cost ratio (1.43), which were statistically at par with T8 (100% NPK + FYM @ 2.5 t ha⁻¹), followed by treatments supplemented with micronutrients. Long-term INM application enhanced soil fertility, with the highest organic carbon (0.50%) recorded under 100% NPK + FYM treatment. Integrated nutrient management proves to be a sustainable strategy for enhancing mustard yield, proitability, and soil health in the intensive rice–mustard system of alluvial soils</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/10/Impact-of-integrated-nutrient-management-on-mustard-productivity-and-soil-fertility-in-a-long-term-rice–mustard-cropping-system.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>]]></body>
</article>
