<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>&lt;strong&gt;Survey and collection of different isolates of &lt;em&gt;Sclerotium rolfsii&lt;/em&gt; from different groundnut growing areas of &lt;em&gt;Erstwhile&lt;/em&gt; Khammam District&lt;/strong&gt;</title>

  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>The groundnut crop is affected by various diseases caused by fungi, bacteria and viruses, among these diseases, stem rot is the most predominant, devastating as well as yield reducing factor of groundnut. In Telangana state, Khammam district is one of the important groundnut cultivating areas growing different varieties. In the recent past, the incidence of stem rot has increased at an alarm level. The survey would ultimately indicate the areas with high disease incidence which can be managed timely to avoid any disease epidemic. Keeping because of the importance of the disease, a roving survey was conducted and a collection of 15 isolates was done during October- December 2022 in the groundnut growing areas of erstwhile Khammam district. The study revealed variations in per cent disease incidence in major groundnut growing areas of erstwhile Khammam district. The per cent disease incidence was recorded highest in Thimminenipalem village of chintakani mandal (52.0) followed by keshavapuram village of kusumanchi mandal (45.0) of Khammam area. A minimum per cent disease Incidence was observed in Dhammapet village of Dhammapeta mandal, Khammam district (7%). The results have also shown that among the 15 isolates collected from the different groundnut cultivars grown in the mentioned groundnut growing areas shown variations in the per cent disease incidence in the decreasing order of SR12 (52.00), SR 13 (46.00), SR7 (45.00), SR11 (44.10), SR8 (42.02), SR15, (41.00), SR9 (36.00), SR3 (33.00), SR14 (32.34), SR4 (32.30), SR2 (28.00), SR10 (28.00), SR6 (23.53), SR5 (17.01) and  SR1 (7.10), respectively.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><p class="aatcc-email"><strong>Corresponding Author:</strong> 
        <a href="mailto:tejaswimedipally1@gmail.com">tejaswimedipally1@gmail.com</a></p><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>The groundnut crop is affected by various diseases caused by fungi, bacteria and viruses, among these diseases, stem rot is the most predominant, devastating as well as yield reducing factor of groundnut. In Telangana state, Khammam district is one of the important groundnut cultivating areas growing different varieties. In the recent past, the incidence of stem rot has increased at an alarm level. The survey would ultimately indicate the areas with high disease incidence which can be managed timely to avoid any disease epidemic. Keeping because of the importance of the disease, a roving survey was conducted and a collection of 15 isolates was done during October- December 2022 in the groundnut growing areas of erstwhile Khammam district. The study revealed variations in per cent disease incidence in major groundnut growing areas of erstwhile Khammam district. The per cent disease incidence was recorded highest in Thimminenipalem village of chintakani mandal (52.0) followed by keshavapuram village of kusumanchi mandal (45.0) of Khammam area. A minimum per cent disease Incidence was observed in Dhammapet village of Dhammapeta mandal, Khammam district (7%). The results have also shown that among the 15 isolates collected from the different groundnut cultivars grown in the mentioned groundnut growing areas shown variations in the per cent disease incidence in the decreasing order of SR12 (52.00), SR 13 (46.00), SR7 (45.00), SR11 (44.10), SR8 (42.02), SR15, (41.00), SR9 (36.00), SR3 (33.00), SR14 (32.34), SR4 (32.30), SR2 (28.00), SR10 (28.00), SR6 (23.53), SR5 (17.01) and  SR1 (7.10), respectively.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Survey-and-collection-of-different-isolates-of-Sclerotium-rolfsii-from-different-groundnut-growing-areas-of-Erstwhile-Khammam-District.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>



<p>Groundnut (<em>Arachis hypogea</em> L.) also known as peanut, earth nut, wonder nut, monkey nut, goobers, is an annual leguminous plant. It is called as king of oil seed. Today groundnut is widely distributed and is cultivated in more than eighty countries in tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world [9]. It belongs to the family of Fabaceae, subfamily Papilionaceae and contains <strong>a</strong> valuable source of all nutrients. India is the second largest producer of groundnut after China. China ranks first in groundnut production with 17.57 million tonnes, followed by India 6.73 million tonnes. &nbsp;In India, groundnut was sown in an area of 6014.95 thousand hectares with a production of 10244.08 thousand tonnes and a productivity of 0.1703 tonnes ha<sup>-1</sup>. In Telangana State, during the year 2020-21, groundnut was cultivated in an area of 127.0 thousand hectares with a production of 290.26 thousand tonnes and a productivity of 0.2286 tonnes ha<sup>-1</sup> [2]. &nbsp;In Telangana state, the major <strong>groundnut </strong>growing regions in the state are Khammam, Wanaparthy, Mahabubnagar, Gadwal, Mahabubabad, Vikarabad, Suryapet, and Nalgonda. In India among the soilborne fungal diseases of groundnut, stem rot <strong>is </strong>caused by <em>Sclerotium. rolfsii</em> is a potential threat to production and is of considerable economic significance for groundnut grown under irrigated conditions. Stem rot is an important disease, causing significant yield losses in several <strong>groundnut</strong> growing countries [5]. The pathogen attacks <strong>the </strong>host plant at all stages when conditions are <strong>favorable</strong> <a>[6].</a> <em>S. rolfsii</em> the incitant of groundnut stem rot is a soil inhabitant, polyphagous, facultative parasite. The pathogen has a wide host range of over 500 plant species in 100 families, throughout the world [4]. This fungus survives in the soil for many years by producing sclerotial bodies and causing the disease either in the form of stem rot or foot rot or root rot or collar rot in addition to leaf blight on several of its hosts [8]. The symptoms of stem rot produced by <em>S. rolfsii</em> on groundnut plants under field conditions were characterized by <strong>the </strong>formation of <strong>a </strong>deep brown lesion on the stem region of the plant just near the ground followed by yellowing of groundnut leaves <strong>and </strong>than by loss of <strong>vigor</strong> and premature death. The fungus infects the stem preferentially by forming a whitish mycelial mat, but it can also infect any part of the plant including leaf, pod, and root. The infected plant showed poor root growth and rotting of the stem region. Death of the plant occurred more rapidly under dry conditions during which <strong>necrosis</strong> instead of browning appeared. On young pods light brown lesions were noticed mycelium and sclerotia developed on even inside the pods. Kernels were infected in the advanced stage of plant growth, such kernels were small and shriveled in size [11].</p>



<p>In order to increase <strong>self-</strong>sufficiency in groundnut production, the area is being increased to yield good productivity and the disease is being reduced by taking up plant protection measures. Since, in Telangana there is no systematic study taken on stem rot disease and their control measures. <strong>The survey</strong> would ultimately <strong>help indicate</strong> the areas with high disease incidence which can be managed timely to avoid any disease epidemic.</p>



<p><strong>Material and methods</strong></p>



<p>A comprehensive roving survey was conducted <strong>from October</strong> to December 2022. <strong>The collection</strong> of isolates <strong>was</strong> taken up in the groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district of Telangana. The collection was done during the months of October to December 2022. A total of 15 isolates were collected randomly from the groundnut cultivars grown in the groundnut growing areas. The external signs and symptoms such as the presence of white mycelial growth, sclerotia, lesion on <strong>the stem</strong>, wilting, drying or dead plants were used to determine the incidence of the stem rot disease in the fields surveyed. Five plots measuring 1 m x 1 m were selected such that one plot was in the <strong>center</strong> of the field and the rest were randomly placed on the four corners leaving 1 m from the border. <strong>A total </strong>number of plants and <strong>a number</strong> of stem rot infected plants were counted in each plot and <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence was calculated by the following formula:</p>



<p><img decoding="async" width="319" height="3" src=""><strong>Per cent</strong> Disease Incidence (PDI) = Number of plants infected by a particular disease ×100</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Total number of plants observed</p>



<p><strong>STATISTICAL ANALYSIS</strong></p>



<p>&nbsp;The statistical analysis was done by using the collected data on the <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence. Scoring was given based on common variables and characters. Principal Component Analysis of recorded survey data was done using SPSS software [3]. Survey data of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district was clustered into <strong>the accurate</strong> selection of the most varied individuals based on <strong>Hierarchial</strong> analysis by using unweighted pair group method arithmetic mean (UPGMA) analysis of NTSYS –PC Software [10].</p>





<p>Fig.1. QGIS Map showing groundnut stem rot disease incidence observed from major groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district during <strong>a roving</strong> survey conducted in the year 2022 &#8211; 2023.</p>









<p>Fig. 2a. Infected stems showing whitish mycelial growth, brown lesions</p>









<p>Fig. 2. Symptoms of groundnut stem rot disease observed under field conditions during the roving survey conducted in the year 2022-2023.</p>





<p>Fig.3. Pure cultures of different isolates of <em>S. rolfsii</em> collected during survey conducted in <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district during 2022-2023</p>



<p><strong>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:</strong></p>



<p><strong>Survey on the incidence of stem rot groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam District</strong><strong></strong></p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A roving survey was conducted during October to December 2022 in major groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district <em>viz</em>., Khammam and <a>Bhadradri kothagudem </a>areas of Telangana to know the occurrence of groundnut stem rot disease caused by <em>S. rolfsii</em>. A total of fifteen fields were covered in eleven villages of Khammam and Bhadradri kothagudem areas during the survey. The information on latitude, longitude, variety/ hybrid, soil type, previous crop, type of <strong>irrigation</strong> and <strong>per cent</strong> Disease Incidence in these areas were collected. Based on <strong>the number</strong> of plants infected and <strong>a total</strong> number of plants, <strong>per cent </strong>Disease Incidence was calculated and the details are given in Table.1</p>



<p>Khammam: nine villages from five <strong>mandals</strong> of Khammam area <em>viz</em>., Dhammapeta Sathupalli, Kusumanchi, Thirmulayapalem and Chintakani respectively. Dhammapet village of Dhammapeta, Bethupally village of sathupalli <strong>was</strong> surveyed in the month of November -2022. Groundnut crop was grown in both sandy soils and red soils in these villages. In these <strong>villages</strong> they followed mostly sprinklers for irrigating groundnut fields. <a>TAG24 is the major hybrid grown in these villages</a>. A total of three isolates were obtained, one isolate (SR1) from Dhammapet village, where <strong>the least</strong> per cent disease incidence was observed (7.01) and two isolates (SR6, SR5) from Bethupally with per cent disease incidence of (23.53 and17.01, respectively).</p>



<p>Seven villages from three <strong>mandals</strong> <em>viz., </em>Keshavapuram and Agraharam villages of Kusumanchi <strong>mandal,</strong> Beerolu and Medidapalli villages of Thirmulayapalem mandal, Thimminenipalem, Chinna mandava, Thirlapuram villages of Chintakani mandal, were surveyed during <strong>December</strong> -2022. Groundnut crop was grown in both sandy soils and red soils in these villages. In these villages both sprinkler and flooding type of irrigation. &nbsp;K6 is the major hybrid grown in these villages. Disease samples were collected during <strong>the vegetative</strong> stage, flowering stage and pod formation stages of the crop. <strong>The highest</strong> per cent disease incidence was observed in Thimminenipalem village (52.00), followed by Chinna mandava village (46.00) and Thirlapuram(32.34) of chintakani mandal, Medidapalli village(44.1) and Beerolu(36.00) of Thirmulayapalem, Keshvapuram village(45.00) and Agraharam village(42.02) of Kusumanchi mandal.</p>



<p>Bhadradri kothagudem: two villages from Aswaraopet mandal <em>viz.,</em> Naramvarigudem and Achuthapuramof Bhadradri kothagudem area, were surveyed during the month of November -2022. Groundnut crop was grown in red soil in these villages. <strong>The survey</strong> was done during pod formation stage of the crop. TAG24 is the major hybrid grown in these villages. Sprinkler type of irrigation was observed in these villages. Per cent disease incidence in Achuthapuram village (33.00), Naramvarigudem village (28.00) of Aswaraopet mandal was observed. Similar findings reported by [7] that the stem rot incidence ranged from 7.4 to 10 <strong>per cent</strong> in major groundnut growing areas of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. shivakumar <em>et al.</em> (2016) conducted <strong>a s</strong>urvey to assess the occurrence of stem rot in major growing areas of Tamil Nadu. The survey&#8217;s findings showed that the incidence of stem rot ranged from 7.88 to 32.02 %. The Cuddalore district&#8217;s Adhivaraganallur village recorded the highest incidence at 32.33 %. [1] reported that stem rot incidence ranged between 6.0 to 22.7 <strong>per cent</strong> in regions of Kadapa and Chittoor districts of Andhra Pradesh.</p>



<p><strong>Comparison of per cent Disease Incidence of 15 different isolates of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii </em>&nbsp;pathogen collected from different groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district</strong></p>





<p>Fig.4. Graph representing the comparison of <strong>per cent</strong> Disease Incidence of 15 different isolates of <em>S. rolfsii</em> pathogen collected from different groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district.</p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td>Name of the isolate</td><td>Area</td><td>Mandal</td><td>Village</td><td>Latitude</td><td>Longitude</td><td>Variety</td><td>Soil type</td><td>Previous crop</td><td>Crop stage</td><td>Type&nbsp; of irrigation</td><td>Per cent disease incidence</td></tr><tr><td><a>SR1</a></td><td>Khammam</td><td>Dhammapeta</td><td>Dhammapet</td><td>17.31<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.9<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>Sandy</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>7.10</td></tr><tr><td><a>SR2</a></td><td>Khammam</td><td>Aswaraopet</td><td>Naramvarigudem</td><td>17.26<sup>0</sup></td><td>81.08<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>Sandy</td><td>Maize</td><td>pod formation</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>28.0</td></tr><tr><td>SR3</td><td>Bhadradri kothagudem</td><td>Aswaraopet</td><td>Achuthapuram</td><td>17.23<sup>0</sup></td><td>81.02<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>Red soil</td><td>Groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>33.0</td></tr><tr><td>SR4</td><td>Bhadradri kothagudem</td><td>Aswaraopet</td><td>Achuthapuram</td><td>17.20<sup>0</sup></td><td>81.02<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>Red soil</td><td>Maize</td><td>pod formation</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>32.30</td></tr><tr><td>SR5</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Sathupalli</td><td>Bethupally</td><td>17.27<sup>0</sup></td><td>81.00<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>red soil</td><td>Banana</td><td>Flowering stage</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>17.01</td></tr><tr><td>SR6</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Sathupalli</td><td>Bethupally</td><td>17.18<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.80<sup>0</sup></td><td>TAG24</td><td>red soil</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>sprinkler</td><td>23.53</td></tr><tr><td><a>SR7</a></td><td>Khammam</td><td>Kusumanchi</td><td>Keshavapuram</td><td>17.23<sup>0</sup></td><td>79.90<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Sandy</td><td>groundnut</td><td>Flowering stage</td><td>Flooding</td><td>45.00</td></tr><tr><td>SR8</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Kusumanchi</td><td>Agraharam</td><td>17.23<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.00<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Sandy</td><td>groundnut</td><td>Flowering stage</td><td>Flooding</td><td>42.02</td></tr><tr><td>SR9</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Thirmulayapalem</td><td>Beerolu</td><td>17.32<sup>0</sup></td><td>79.90<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>Sprinkler</td><td>36.00</td></tr><tr><td>SR10</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Thirmulayapalem</td><td>Beerolu</td><td>17.30<sup>0</sup></td><td>79.94<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>Maize</td><td>Vegetative stage</td><td>Sprinkler</td><td>28.00</td></tr><tr><td>SR11</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Thirmulayapalem</td><td>Medidapalli</td><td>17.32<sup>0</sup></td><td>79.93<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Sandy</td><td>Groundnut</td><td>Vegetative stage</td><td>Flooding</td><td>44.1</td></tr><tr><td>SR12</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Chintakani</td><td>Thimminenipalem</td><td>17.05<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.16<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>Groundnut</td><td>Pod formation</td><td>Flooding</td><td>52.00</td></tr><tr><td>SR13</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Chintakani</td><td><a>Thimminenipalem</a></td><td>17.07<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.16<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>Flooding</td><td>46.00</td></tr><tr><td>SR14</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Chintakani</td><td><a>Chinna mandava</a></td><td>17.02<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.17<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>Flooding</td><td>32.34</td></tr><tr><td>SR15</td><td>Khammam</td><td>Chintakani</td><td>Thirlapuram</td><td>17.80<sup>0</sup></td><td>80.48<sup>0</sup></td><td>K6</td><td>Red soil</td><td>groundnut</td><td>pod formation</td><td>Flooding</td><td>41.00</td></tr><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>C.D.</td><td>1.5</td></tr><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>SE(m)</td><td>0.517</td></tr><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>SE(d)</td><td>0.731</td></tr><tr><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>&nbsp;</td><td>C.V.</td><td>2.646</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>



<p>Table.1 Details of survey on incidence of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em> in groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam District &nbsp;Among the 15 isolates, the highest <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence was recorded in <a>SR12 (52.00), SR 13 (46.00), SR7 (45.00), SR11 (44.10), SR8 (42.02), SR15, (41.00), SR9 (36.00), SR3 (33.00), SR14 (32.34), SR4 (32.30), SR2 (28.00), SR10 (28.00), SR6 (23.53), SR5 (17.01) and&nbsp; SR1 (7.10) </a>in the decreasing order of <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence, respectively.<strong><br></strong></p>



<p><strong>Principal Component Analysis of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em> population of different survey variables</strong></p>



<p>The data collected during the survey was scored based on common variables and characters. Further, Principal Component Analysis of recorded survey data was done using SPSS software and the results are shown in <strong>Table</strong> 2.</p>



<p><strong>Table.2. Principal Component Analysis of <a><em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em> </a>population of different&nbsp; survey variables</strong></p>



<figure class="wp-block-table"><table><tbody><tr><td><a><strong>COMPONENTS</strong></a></td><td><strong>EIGENVALUES</strong></td><td><strong>PROPORTION</strong></td><td><strong>CUMULATIVE PROPORTION(%)</strong></td></tr><tr><td>Mandals</td><td>2.555</td><td>0.511</td><td>0.511</td></tr><tr><td>Villages</td><td>1.296</td><td>0.259</td><td>0.77</td></tr><tr><td>Soil type &nbsp;</td><td>0.746</td><td>0.149 &nbsp;</td><td>0.919</td></tr><tr><td>Crop stage</td><td>0.384 &nbsp;</td><td>0.077 &nbsp;</td><td>0.996</td></tr><tr><td>Per cent disease incidence</td><td>0.02 &nbsp;</td><td>0.004 &nbsp;</td><td>1</td></tr></tbody></table></figure>





<p>Fig.5 Screen plot for survey data of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district by using Principal Component Analysis.</p>



<p>According to Principal Component Analysis, <strong>Eigen value</strong>≥ 1 i.e., mandal and Village components was considered for <strong>the existence</strong> of variability among 15 different isolates of <em>S. rolfsii</em> pathogen. The results from the Principal Component Analysis of recorded survey data <strong>was shown</strong> in the form of Eigen values, which shows that the highest Eigen value <strong>recorded</strong> at mandal level <strong>indicating</strong> greater variability with regard to geographical location.</p>



<p><strong>Dendrogram of 15 isolates of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em> generated by unweighted pair group method arithmetic mean (UPGMA) analysis of survey data of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district.</strong></p>



<p>&nbsp;The data collected during the survey data in <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district was clustered into <strong>the accurate</strong> selection of the most varied individuals based on Hierarchial analysis by using unweighted pair group method arithmetic mean (UPGMA) analysis of NTSYS –PC Software and a dendrogram was prepared and the phylogenic classification revealed existence of diverse isolates within the same species. Scores <strong>derived</strong> from <strong>the survey</strong> profile showed 77.7% similarity within the isolates of <em>S.rolfsii</em>. Based on UPGMA clustering, 195isolates were grouped into 6 clusters.</p>





<p>Fig.6. Dendrogram of 15 isolates of <em>S.rolfsii</em> generated by unweighted pair group method arithmetic mean (UPGMA) analysis of survey data of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district.</p>



<p>Among the 6 clusters, cluster-1 <strong>consist</strong> of 1 isolate <em>i.e</em>., SR1 collected from Dhammapet village of Dhammapeta mandal, Khammam area, having 7.01 <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence.</p>



<p>&nbsp;Cluster-2 <strong>consists</strong> of three isolates collected from two villages <em>viz</em>., Naramvarigudem, Achuthapuram of Aswaroapet mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem area comprises of isolate SR2, SR3 and SR4 which in turn categorized into two subgroups. Frist subgroup consist of isolate SR2 collected from Naramvarigudem village having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 28.00 and the second <strong>sub-group</strong> <strong>constitutes </strong>two isolates SR3 and SR4 from Achuthapuram village having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 33.00 and 32.30 respectively.</p>



<p>Cluster -3 <strong>consists</strong> of SR5 and SR6 isolates collected from Bethupally village of Sathupalli mandal, Khammam area having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 17.01 and 23.53 respectively. Cluster-4 consists of SR9 and SR10 collected from Beerolu village of Thirumalayapalem mandal, Khammam area having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of&nbsp; 36.00 and 28.00 respectively. Cluster-5 constitute three isolates which were further categorized into two subgroups. Isolate SR7 and SR8 were collected from Keshavapuram and Agraharam villages of Kusumanchi mandal having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 45.00 and 42.02 respectively. SR11 was collected from Medidapally village of Thirumalayapalem mandal which reported <strong>a per cent </strong>disease incidence of 44.10.</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Cluster-6 <strong>consists</strong> of 4 isolates which were further categorized into 3 subgroups. <strong>The first sub-group</strong> <strong>constitutes </strong>SR12 and SR13 collected from Thimminenipalem village of Chintakani mandal of Khammam area having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 52.00 and 46.00 respectively. The second <strong>sub-group</strong> <strong>consists </strong>of <strong>isolate </strong>SR14 collected from Chinna mandava village of Chintakani having <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 32.34. <strong>The third</strong> <strong>sub-group</strong> <strong>constitutes</strong> of isolate SR15 collected from Thirlapuram of Chintakani mandal having &nbsp;a <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence of 41.00.</p>



<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong>:</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The present findings from the survey conducted and collection of 15 isolates done during the months of October- December 2022 in the groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile</em> Khammam district <em>viz</em>., Khammam and Bhadradri kothagudem of Telangana grown in this areas respectively to record the disease incidence of stem rot in <strong>groundnut revealed</strong> the variations in <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence in major groundnut growing areas of <em>erstwhile </em>Khammam district. Of all <strong>the locations</strong>, The highest <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence was recorded in Thimminenipalem village of&nbsp; <a>Chintakani mandal </a>of Khammam district (52.0) and <strong>the lowest per cent </strong>disease incidence was observed in dhammapet village of dhammapeta mandal (7.1%). The results also shown that among the 15 isolates collected from the <strong>groundnut cultivars</strong> grown in the mentioned groundnut growing areas shown variations in the <strong>per cent</strong> disease incidence in the decreasing order of isolate SR12 (52.00), followed by isolates SR 13 (46.00), SR7 (45.00), SR11 (44.10), SR8 (42.02), SR15, (41.00), SR9 (36.00), SR3 (33.00), SR14 (32.34), SR4 (32.30), SR2 (28.00), SR10 (28.00), SR6 (23.53), SR5 (17.01) and&nbsp; SR1 (7.10) respectively. <strong>The data</strong> generated will help in <strong>the identification</strong> and application of suitable control methods based <strong>on the per cent</strong> disease incidence recorded in different cultivars and different locations.</p>



<p><strong>Acknowledgement</strong></p>



<p>I sincerely thank <strong>the</strong> Department of Pathology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, <strong>Hyderabad,</strong> Telangana, India, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Wyra, Khammam, Telangana, India, Department of Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, <strong>Hyderabad,</strong> Telangana, India, Central instrumentation Cell, College of Agriculture, Rajendranagar, <strong>Hyderabad,</strong> Telangana, India for their constant help in my research work. I felt elated to express my bountiful thanks to those who directly or indirectly helped me in <strong>the</strong> successful completion of the work The authors are incredibly thankful to the editor and assistant editor for finding interest in the present study. Furthermore, we also thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive ideas to strengthen the current research work are appreciated as well.</p>



<p><strong>Conflict of interest</strong></p>



<p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest</p>



<p><strong>Ethical approval</strong></p>



<p>This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.</p>



<p><strong>Funding</strong></p>



<p>The author (s) received financial support from <strong>the</strong> institutional research grant of Professor Jayashankar Telangana state agricultural University and <strong>the</strong> Government of Telangana <strong>for financial</strong> help and for <strong>providing research</strong> facilities which can’t be forgettable.</p>



<p><strong>REFERENCES:</strong></p>



<p>[1]. Deepthi, K.C and Reddy, N.E. 2020. Disease incidence assessment of stem rot and collar</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rot of groundnut (<em>Arachis hypogaea</em> L.) in Kadapa and Chittor districts of Andhra</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Pradesh.&nbsp;<em>Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry</em>.&nbsp;<em>9</em>(2):725-726.</p>



<p>[2]. Indiastat.com, 2021. <a href="http://WWW.Indiastat.com">WWW.Indiastat.com</a>.</p>



<p>[3]. Joliffe, I.T and Cadima, J. 2016. Principal Component Analysis: A review and recent</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; developments. <em>The Royal Society Publishing</em>. 374.</p>



<p>[4]. Kuldhar, D.P and Suryawanshi, A.P. 2017. Integrated management of stem rot and pod</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rot (<em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em>) of groundnut (<em>Arachis hypogaea</em> L.). <em>Agriculture Update</em>. 12: 238-</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 246 .</p>



<p>[5]. Mehan, V.K., Mayee, C.D and McDonald, D. 1994. Management of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em>&#8211;</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; caused stem and pod rots of groundnut a critical review. <em>International Journal of Pest</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Management</em>. 40:313-320.</p>



<p>[6]. Punja, Z.K. 1985. The biology, ecology, and control of <em>Sclerotium rolfsii</em>. <em>Annual Review</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; of Phytopathology</em>. 23:97-127.</p>



<p>[7]. Rani, V.D., Sudini, H., Reddy, P.N., Devi, G.U and Kumar, K.V.K., 2016. Survey for the</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; assessment of incidence of stem rot and collar rot diseases of groundnut in major</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; groundnut growing areas of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana States.&nbsp;<em>Annals of Biological</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Research</em>,&nbsp;<em>7</em>(7): 6-8.</p>



<p>[8]. Rashmi, K.H., Bireswar, Sinha., Pramesh, K.H and Sobita Devi, P.H. 2017. Native</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <em>Trichoderma spp</em> for the Managemet of stem rot of Groundnut Caused by <em>Sclerotium</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rolfsii</em> Sacc. Manipur, India. <em>International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Science</em>. 6(10): 1343- 1351.</p>



<p>[9]. Madhusudhana, B. 2013. A Survey on Area Production and Productivity of Groundnut</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Crop in India. <em>Journal of Economics and Finance</em>. 1(3): 01-07.</p>



<p>[10]. Sattar, A., Riaz, A., Gondal, A.S., Mehmood, N and Hyder, S. 2016. Survey of chilli</p>



<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; anthracnose; a potential threat to chilli crops- A focus on Punjab, Pakistan. <em>Journal of</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Phytopathology.</em> 28(1): 81-86.</p>



<p>[11]. Sivakumar, T., Sanjeevkumar, K and Balabaskar, P., 2016. Variability in <em>Sclerotium</em></p>



<p><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; rolfsii </em>Sacc. causing Stem rot of groundnut.&nbsp;<em>Bulletin of Environment &nbsp;Pharmacology and </em><em>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Life Science.[Spl. Issue 2]</em>.<em>92</em>:99.</p>
]]></body>
</article>
