<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Techno-economic Worth Assessment of Self-propelled Walking Type Paddy</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.131</doi>
  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>Assessment of field performance of paddy transplanter for two-row to plant spacing’s S 1<br />
and S 2 was observed with the economic worth from the viewpoint of custom hiring operator or<br />
the progressive farmer. Actual field capacity and field efficiency were maximum and fuel<br />
consumption was minimum for S 1 . The crop yield and average number of plants/m 2 were higher<br />
in the case of S 1 . The total cost of mechanical transplanting was Rs. 6798.66 per ha and the<br />
break-even point was 7.68 ha/yr. which was less than the actual use of the machine per year with<br />
the optimal payback period of 6.85 years whereas, from a custom hiring service provider<br />
viewpoint, the payback period is 1.17. The benefit-cost ratio was 1.84, which is greater than<br />
unity indicating a profitable venture. The mechanical transplanting of paddy at S 1 was better than<br />
transplanting at S 2 . The study showed that the use of mechanical paddy transplanting technology<br />
is a profitable and acceptable venture from both customer hiring service provider as well as from<br />
the customer farmer viewpoint with the additional benefit of saving in labor and time.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Original Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2024.12.04.131</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>Assessment of field performance of paddy transplanter for two-row to plant spacing’s S 1<br />
and S 2 was observed with the economic worth from the viewpoint of custom hiring operator or<br />
the progressive farmer. Actual field capacity and field efficiency were maximum and fuel<br />
consumption was minimum for S 1 . The crop yield and average number of plants/m 2 were higher<br />
in the case of S 1 . The total cost of mechanical transplanting was Rs. 6798.66 per ha and the<br />
break-even point was 7.68 ha/yr. which was less than the actual use of the machine per year with<br />
the optimal payback period of 6.85 years whereas, from a custom hiring service provider<br />
viewpoint, the payback period is 1.17. The benefit-cost ratio was 1.84, which is greater than<br />
unity indicating a profitable venture. The mechanical transplanting of paddy at S 1 was better than<br />
transplanting at S 2 . The study showed that the use of mechanical paddy transplanting technology<br />
is a profitable and acceptable venture from both customer hiring service provider as well as from<br />
the customer farmer viewpoint with the additional benefit of saving in labor and time.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Techno-economic-Worth-Assessment-of-Self-propelled-Walking-Type-Paddy-Transplanter.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>
<p>Transplanter</p>
]]></body>
</article>
