<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><article>
  <title>Various Irrigation and Fertigation Management Practices on Flower Quality, Cut Flower Yield and Soil Nutrient Status of Chrysanthemum(Chrysanthemum Morifolium Ramat.) Cultivars</title>

      <doi>https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.02.474</doi>
  
  <authors>
      </authors>

      <abstract><![CDATA[<p>A field experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons of 2023–24 and 2024–25 at the Precision<br />
Farming Development Centre (PFDC), Water Technology Centre, at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi. The<br />
research focused on investigating the impact of various irrigation and fertigation management practices<br />
on flower quality, cut flower yield and soil nutrient status of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium<br />
ramat.) cultivars. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design with three factors: two cultivars<br />
(autumn pink and autumn white), three irrigation levels (0.5 Epan, 0.75 Epan and 1.0 Epan), and three<br />
fertigation schedules (50%, 75%, and 100% recommended dose of fertilizers). Based on the Royal<br />
Horticultural Society (RHS) Colour Chart classification, the Autumn Pink (V1) variety consistently<br />
exhibited 65 C (Pale Purplish Pink) across all irrigation and fertigation levels, while Autumn White (V2)<br />
maintained 157 D (Greenish White). The observed stability in flower colour suggested that genetic factors<br />
primarily control floral pigmentation, with minimal environmental influence under the applied treatments.<br />
Similarly, the treatment combination V2I2F3 (Autumn White + Irrigation at 0.75 Epan + 100% RDF)<br />
consistently achieved the highest number of cut flowers per ha (i.e 488,975.21 flowers/ha), hence<br />
resulting in higher gross returns, net returns and overall profitability. Pertaining to soil physical and<br />
chemical parameters the pH was 7.65 with 0.29 dS m -1 EC and 0.43% organic carbon, 125.66<br />
kg/ha, 26.55 kg/ha and 281,41 kg/ha available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O, suggested that optimum<br />
supplementation of nutrients were essential to improve the inflorescence traits, yield and soil nutrient<br />
status of chrysanthemum.</p>
]]></abstract>
  
  <body><![CDATA[<div class="aatcc-article-container"><div class="aatcc-category-label">Original Research Article</div><div class="aatcc-meta-box"><div class="aatcc-doi-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-doi-btn" href="https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.02.474" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21276/AATCCReview.2025.13.02.474</a>
        </div><div class="aatcc-abstract-section">
                <h3>Abstract</h3>
                <div class="aatcc-abstract-text"><p>A field experiment was carried out during the rabi seasons of 2023–24 and 2024–25 at the Precision<br />
Farming Development Centre (PFDC), Water Technology Centre, at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi. The<br />
research focused on investigating the impact of various irrigation and fertigation management practices<br />
on flower quality, cut flower yield and soil nutrient status of chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium<br />
ramat.) cultivars. The experiment was laid out in a split-split plot design with three factors: two cultivars<br />
(autumn pink and autumn white), three irrigation levels (0.5 Epan, 0.75 Epan and 1.0 Epan), and three<br />
fertigation schedules (50%, 75%, and 100% recommended dose of fertilizers). Based on the Royal<br />
Horticultural Society (RHS) Colour Chart classification, the Autumn Pink (V1) variety consistently<br />
exhibited 65 C (Pale Purplish Pink) across all irrigation and fertigation levels, while Autumn White (V2)<br />
maintained 157 D (Greenish White). The observed stability in flower colour suggested that genetic factors<br />
primarily control floral pigmentation, with minimal environmental influence under the applied treatments.<br />
Similarly, the treatment combination V2I2F3 (Autumn White + Irrigation at 0.75 Epan + 100% RDF)<br />
consistently achieved the highest number of cut flowers per ha (i.e 488,975.21 flowers/ha), hence<br />
resulting in higher gross returns, net returns and overall profitability. Pertaining to soil physical and<br />
chemical parameters the pH was 7.65 with 0.29 dS m -1 EC and 0.43% organic carbon, 125.66<br />
kg/ha, 26.55 kg/ha and 281,41 kg/ha available N, P 2 O 5 and K 2 O, suggested that optimum<br />
supplementation of nutrients were essential to improve the inflorescence traits, yield and soil nutrient<br />
status of chrysanthemum.</p>
</div>
            </div><div class="aatcc-pdf-wrap">
            <a class="aatcc-pdf-btn" href="https://aatcc.peerjournals.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Various-Irrigation-and-Fertigation-Management-Practices-on-Flower-Quality-Cut-Flower-Yield-and-Soil-Nutrient-Status-of-ChrysanthemumChrysanthemum-Morifolium-Ramat.-Cultivars.pdf" target="_blank">View / Download PDF</a>
        </div></div></div>]]></body>
</article>
