Department of RMCS, College of Community Science, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India

Corresponding Author Email: radhikavarnam58@gmail.com

DOI : https://doi.org/

Keywords

Garrett ranking, soil fertility and five-point continuum scale

Download this article as:

Abstract

The study utilized the dimension of soil fertility/land fertility to measure the agricultural performance of small and marginal farmers. Likert-type summated rating scale technique was employed to assess the practices adopted by these farmers to enhance their agricultural performance through soil fertility. Garrett’s ranking technique was then utilized to rank the preference of respondents based on the most frequently adopted practices for soil fertility. The findings revealed that pre-plowing activity, stubble burning, deep plowing, and exposure to sun were the most frequently utilized practices by the respondents to improve soil fertility. This can be attributed to the small landholding size, low economic status, and indigenous knowledge of small and marginal farmers. The majority of the respondents have lower level of adoption of soil fertility practices. These findings contribute to easy understanding of the practices influencing soil fertility management among small-scale farmers and can inform the development of targeted interventions and support programs to enhance soil health in similar contexts.

Introduction

Soil fertility is defined as the capacity of soil to support plant growth by supplying necessary nutrients, and by possessing suitable chemical, physical, and biological properties to serve as a favorable habitat for plant growth (Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations). It is crucial for sustainable agriculture and is often maintained through the use of practices such as crop rotation; inter cropping, and the application of organic manure, vermicompost, pesticides, fertilizers and other soil amendments.

About 15 per-cent of plots received no soil fertility treatments, while 35 per-cent received a combination of inorganic fertilizer and manure. Maize yield was significantly influenced by soil fertility management, with the greatest impact by using a combination of inorganic fertilizer and manure. Using manure or compost alone had a moderate impact on yield [1].

An investigation conducted on smallholder farmers’ knowledge on using bio-slurry as a soil fertility alteration input for potato production in Kenya. Results revealed that only 18 per-cent of farmers used bio-slurry, while 78 per-cent relying on chemical fertilizers and other manures. Challenges were reported with bio-slurry use, including a lack of knowledge on the exact quantity to apply and storage of excess slurry. Nearly 36 per-cent of the farmers used bio-slurry due to its availability and cost-effectiveness compared to chemical fertilizers. Adoption was limited due to challenges while application and storage [6].

A study conducted on soil fertility status of forage-growing soils of Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district, Telangana. Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district soils were mostly alkaline with low organic carbon content, but some pockets have high levels (13.3%). Electrical conductivity ranges from 0.06-1.14 dSm-1, with high calcium content. Nitrogen was low in almost all samples, while available phosphorus was high in 49.4 per-cent and medium in 29.3 per-cent of samples, indicating 21.3 per-cent of soils have medium to high phosphorus levels. Zinc deficiency was present in 9.4 per-cent of samples, while Cu and Mn were sufficient and Fe is deficient in 10.6 per-cent of soils [5].

Based on the literature review it can be inferred that majority of the farmers were utilizing chemical fertilizers to enhance soil fertility. Some farmers were practicing combination of inorganic fertilizer and manure; also had a greatest impact on soil fertility but using manure or compost alone had a moderate impact on yield. As there were no previous studies on the application of the Garrett ranking method for assessing practices aimed at improving land fertility, the current study was undertaken to identify the best practices adopted by farmers to enhance their land fertility.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted in the Bhadradri Kothagudem and Mulugu districts of Telangana state. A Likert-type summated rating scale technique was followed for development of a scale with a five-point continuum ranging from “very frequently”, “frequently”, “occasionally”, “rarely” and “never “, with scoring of 5,4,3,2 and 1 respectively. The scale was used to collect primary data from 300 small and marginal farmers, with 150 farmers from each district by using a simple random sampling technique to assess the frequency of various practices adopted to improve soil fertility. The level of practices adopted to improve the land (Soil) fertility was measured by using obtained maximum and minimum scores of each statement.

Application of Garret’s ranking method

To find out the most significant factor which influences the respondent, Garrett’s ranking technique was used. Respondents were requested to assign the rank to all the statements, these ranks were then converted into score values using the following formula:

Percent position = 100 (Rij – 0.5)/Nj

Where:

Rij = Rank given for the ith statement by jth respondents

Nj = Number of statements ranked by jth respondents

Percent position score was calculated using percent position formula. This score was then used to determine the Garrett score. The Garrett ranking technique was applied to assess the rate of adoption of soil fertility practices. The prime advantage of this technique over simple frequency distribution is that it arranges the practices based on respondents’ preferences. It is commonly used to rank statements based on respondent ratings, which were subsequently converted into specific ranks. These responses were ranked using the Garrett ranking technique based on the frequency levels such as “very frequently, frequently, occasionally, rarely and never” with corresponding rankings of 1,2,3,4 and 5 respectively. The purpose of this ranking was to determine the most crucial agricultural practice adopted by farmers to enhance soil fertility. To convert these ranks into percentage, percent position formula should be used.

The ranking of each statement was converted into points using the Garrett table [4]. This conversion involved assigning points based on the per cent position of each rank. The resulting value, denoted as Rij, was then multiplied by the corresponding Garrett value to obtain the total Garrett score. Subsequently, the average Garrett score was calculated by dividing the total Garrett score by the number of statements. The statement with the highest average value was considered the best-ranking option.

Table 1 Percent position and Garrett value for soil/ land fertility

S. No.Percentage positionCalculated valueGarrett value
1100(1-0.5)/124.1783
2100(2-0.5)/1212.573
3100(3-0.5)/1220.8366
4100(4-0.5)/1229.1761
5100(5-0.5)/1237.556

The Garrett ranks were calculated by using appropriate Garrett ranking formula. Based on the Garrett ranks i.e. 1 to 5, the Garrett value was obtained from the standard Garrett table. In Table 2, the scores of each statement in the soil fertility dimension were multiplied by the obtained Garrett value from Table 3. These resulting scores were recorded in Table 3. By summing up each row in Table 3, the total Garrett scores were obtained and presented.

Results and Discussion

The practices adopted and followed by the respondents related to improve soil fertility to enhance agricultural performance were discussed below.

Table 2 revealed that, majority (95%) of the respondents in Bhadradri Kothagudem district ranked 1st in adopting the pre-plowing activity, followed by 2nd rank (3%) and 4th rank (2%). In terms of adopting stubble burning activity, majority (85%) of the respondents were ranked 1st, while only 3 per cent were ranked least. Deep plowing and exposure to sun was ranked 1st by 55 per cent of the respondents and least ranked by 5 per cent. However, practices such as organic farming, soil test based fertilizer application and stubble mulching were ranked least by 99 per cent, 96 per cent and 94 per cent of the respondents respectively.

Table 2 Distribution of respondents based on preference and ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility in Bhadradri Kothagudem district (N=150)

S. No.Statements1st2nd3rd4th5th
F%F%F%F%F%
1Growing fodder crops149.3353.3385.33128.0011174.00
2Penning 53.3342.6785.33149.3311979.33
3Farm yard manure  4630.67149.33128.002013.335838.67
4Pre plough14294.6753.3332.00
5Deep plough and expose the soil to sun8355.334429.33117.3342.6785.33
6Inter – cropping with legumes 53.33138.671510.0085.3310972.67
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation64.0014496.00
8Crop rotation with legumes 96.0085.3313388.67
9Organic farming10.6714999.33
10Green manure  10.6721.3364.001510.0012684.00
11Stubble- mulching and incorporation 10.6710.6774.6714194.00
12Stubble burning 12885.33149.3310.6721.3353.33

From the table 3 it was observed that, pre-plowing activity was adopted by most of the respondents in Bhadradri Kothagudem district with mean score of 82.23 and ranked in first place as most of the people were familiar about it and easy access to mechanical ploughs, followed by stubble Burning stood in second rank with a mean score of 80.76 which may be due to quicker, easier and cost-effective practice. Accordingly, deep plowing and exposure to sun was ranked third with mean score of 76.79 as people were well aware about it. Majority i.e. cent per-cent of the farmers practiced deep summer plowing activity [7]. Biofertilizers along with practices like crop rotation, tillage maintenance, and crop residue recycling, enhances soil fertility [9].

Table 3 Calculation of Garret Value and Ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility by the respondents in Bhadradri Kothagudem district (N=150)

S. NoStatementsRanks given by the respondents  Total score  Mean  Rank
1st2nd3rd4th5th
1Growing fodder crops11623655287326216900360.025
2Penning 4152925288546664875358.357
3Farm yard manure  38181022792122032481010067.334
4Pre plough117863651831233482.231
5Deep plough and expose the soil to sun688932127262444481151976.793
6Inter – cropping with legumes 4159499904886104894659.646
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation3668064843056.2011
8Crop rotation with legumes 7475287448872358.158
9Organic farming668344841056.0712
10Green manure  831463969157056859657.319
11Stubble- mulching and incorporation 83664277896847256.4810
12Stubble burning 11621022661222801211480.762

However, practices like organic farming, soil test based fertilizer application and stubble mulching were ranked least with mean score of 56.07 (XIIth Rank), 56.20 (XIth Rank) and 56.48 (Xth Rank), respectively. Respondents stated that adoption of these practices require high investment.

Table 4 showed that, majority (92%) of the respondents in Mulugu district ranked 1st in adopting pre-plowing activity, followed by 2nd rank (8%). In terms of adopting stubble burning activity, majority (57%) of the respondents were ranked 1st, followed by 2nd rank, 3rd rank and 4th rank by 31 per cent, 12 per cent and one per cent respectively. Deep plowing and exposure to sun was ranked 1st by 58 per cent of the respondents, followed by 2nd rank (40%) and 3rd rank and 4th rank by one per cent each. However, practices such as organic farming, soil test based fertilizer application and stubble mulching were ranked least with 99 per cent, 96 per cent and 94 per cent of the respondents respectively.

Table 4 Distribution of respondents based on preference and ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility in Mulugu district (N=150)

S. No.Items1st2nd3rd4th5th
F%F%F%F%F%
1.Growing fodder crops10.6742.6721.331912.6712482.67
2.Penning 10.6710.6732.004731.339865.33
3.Farm yard manure  2416.0064.003020.004530.004530.00
4.Pre plough13892.00128.00
5.Deep plough and expose the soil to sun8758.006140.6710.6710.67
6.Inter – cropping with legumes 10.6721.3321.3314596.67
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation10.6710.6796.004228.009764.67
8.Crop rotation with legumes 42.6714697.33
9.Organic farming10.6710.6710.6714798.00
10.Green manure  21.33117.333020.0010771.33
11.Stubble- mulching and incorporation 21.3314898.67
12.Stubble Burning 8556.674630.671812.0010.67

Table 5 revealed that in Mulugu district, majority of the respondents were adopting pre-plowing activity with a mean score of 82.20 and ranked in first place. Deep plowing and exposing to sun with second rank, and stubble burning stood in the third rank with mean scores of 78.67 and 77.75, respectively. The results were in harmony with [7]

While discussing with the respondents, it revealed that pre-plowing is a common practice in the region, tolerance to water and improve crop yields. Deep plowing and exposing the soil to sun controls pests and weeds and improves soil fertility. Even though stubble burning is not a good practice, people preferred to burn the agricultural waste with in the field may be due to lack of awareness about it.

However, practices such as stubble mulching, organic farming, and intercropping with legumes were ranked least, with mean scores of 56.07, 56.28, and 56.38 and twelfth, eleventh and tenth rank respectively, this may be due to lack of knowledge or awareness about these practices and lack of farm yard manure. Majority (95.5%) of the farmers were using animal manure [8].

Table 5 Calculation of Garret Value and Ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility by the respondents in Mulugu district (N=150)

  S. No.  Items  Ranks given by the respondents  Total score  Mean  Rank
1st 2nd3rd4th5th
1Growing fodder crops8329213211596944861057.408
2Penning 837319828675488870958.067
3Farm yard manure  1992438198027452520967564.504
4Pre plough114548761233082.201
5Deep plough and expose the soil to sun7221445366611180178.672
6Inter – cropping with legumes 831321228120845756.3810
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation837359425625432874458.295
8Crop rotation with legumes 3328176850856.729
9Organic farming8366618232844256.2811
10Green manure  16672618305992871458.096
11Stubble- mulching and incorporation 1228288841056.0712
12Stubble burning 705533581188611166277.753

Table 6 revealed that, majority (93%) of the respondents were ranked 1st in adopting pre-plowing activity, followed by 2nd rank (6%) and 4th rank (1%). In terms of adopting stubble burning activity, majority (71%) of the respondents were ranked 1st, followed by 2nd rank, 3rd rank and 5th rank and 4th rank by 20 per cent, 6 per cent and two per cent and one per cent of the respondents respectively. Deep plowing and exposure to sun was ranked 1st with 57 per cent, followed by 2nd rank (35%) and 3rd rank (4%), 5th rank (3%) and 4th rank (2%) by the respondents. However, practices such as organic farming, stubble mulching and crop rotation were ranked least with 99 per cent, 96 per cent and 93 per cent of the respondents respectively.

Table 6 Distribution of total respondents based on preference and ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility (N=300)

S. No.Items1st2nd3rd4th5th
F%F%F%F%F%
1.Growing fodder crops155.0093.00103.333110.3323578.33
2.Penning 62.0051.67113.676120.3321772.33
3.Farm yard manure  7023.33206.674214.006521.6710334.33
4.Pre plough28093.33175.6731.00
5.Deep plough and expose the soil to sun17056.6710535.00124.0051.6782.67
6.Inter – cropping with legumes 62.00134.33175.67103.3325484.67
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation10.3310.3393.004816.0024180.33
8.Crop rotation with legumes 134.3382.6727993.00
9.Organic farming10.3320.6710.3329698.67
10.Green manure  31.0020.67175.674515.0023377.67
11.Stubble- mulching and incorporation 10.3310.3393.0028996.33
12.Stubble Burning 21371.006020.00196.3331.0051.67

Based on the data presented in table 7, it can be observed that pre-plowing activity was ranked Ist with a mean score of 82.21, indicating that it was the most frequently adopted agricultural practice among the respondents as it is a common practice that helps to loosen the soil and prepare it for sowing. Stubble Burning was ranked IInd with a mean score of 79.25 due to its ease of implementation and low cost, despite its negative impact on the environment. Deep plowing and exposing to sun, which was ranked IIIrd with a mean score of 77.73 as this might have been favored as it helps to kill the weed seeds and pests in the soil.

However, organic farming was stood in last place with twelfth rank by mean score of 56.17, indicating that it was the least frequently adopted practice among the respondents due to the high cost, unavailability of manures and technical knowledge required for its implementation. Stubble mulching and application of soil test-based fertilizer were ranked eleventh and tenth rank respectively, with mean scores of 56.27 and 57.25 since these were relatively newer and less familiar practices to the farmers. Maize-legume intercropping systems decrease nutrient loss and improve soil fertility mentioned by [2]. Majority (96%) of the respondents implemented recommended methods of sowing, time of fertilizer application, and crop rotation [3].

Table 7 Calculation of Garret Value and Ranking of practices adopted to increase the land (Soil) fertility by total respondents (N=300)

S. NoStatementsRanks given by the respondents  Total score  Mean  Rank
1st2nd3rd4th5th
1Growing fodder crops12456576601891131601761358.715
2Penning 4983657263721121521746258.216
3Farm yard manure  581014602772396557681977565.924
4Pre plough2324012411832466482.211
5Deep plough and expose the soil to sun1411076657923054482332077.733
6Inter – cropping with legumes 4989491122610142241740358.017
7Soil test based fertilizer recommendation83735942928134961717457.2510
8Crop rotation with legumes 1079528156241723157.449
9Organic farming8313261165761685256.1712
10Green manure  24914611222745130481731057.708
11Stubble- mulching and incorporation 8366549161841688256.2711
12Stubble burning 17679438012541832802377679.252

The maximum and minimum scores of land fertility were 60 and 12 respectively. Based on the inclusive class interval, the respondents were split into three categories: low, medium, and high.

From the fig.1 it was observed that, three categories based on obtained scores i.e. low (12 to 28), medium (28 to 44), and high (44 to 60) levels of practice. In Bhadradri Kothagudem district, more than half of the respondents had lower level of adoption of soil fertility practices, followed by a medium (45%) level of adoption. In Mulugu district, similar results were found i.e., majority (72%) of the respondents had a lower level of adoption, followed by a medium (28%) level of adoption of soil fertility practices.

Figure: 1 District wise distribution of respondents by level of practices adopted to improve the land (Soil) fertility

Overall data showed that, 63 per-cent of the respondents had a lower level of adoption of soil fertility practices, indicating that they found the cost of maintaining soil fertility by using organic manure and animal manure to be high. However, 37 per cent had a medium level suggesting that some people had animals and could use them as manure. The obtained mean and standard deviation scores were 2.22±0.17.

Conclusion

The present study aimed to identify the preference and ranking of practices adopted by the farmers to enhance soil fertility. The results showed that the most frequently adopted practices were pre-plowing activity, stubble burning and deep plowing, and exposure to the sun due to their cost-effectiveness, ease of use, and effectiveness in killing weed seeds and pests. Practices like organic farming, stubble mulching, and application of soil test-based fertilizer were poorly adopted, possibly due to the unavailability of manures and the low economic status of the farmers. Policy makers should focus on developmental programs regarding supply of organic manure at reasonable price and conduct awareness programs on soil fertility practices.

Acknowledgment

We duly acknowledge the cooperation extended by the respondents without whom, this study would not have been possible.

Conflicts of interest

We do not have a conflict of interest as authors.

Future scope of the study

  • The same study can be conducted in another state.
  • The same study can be conducted on large farmers with a huge sample size.
  • The same study can be conducted on specific crop cultivators, such as cotton, wheat, and paddy farmers, etc.

References

[1] Adem, M., Azadi, H., Spalevic, V., Pietrzykowski, M. and Scheffran, J. 2023. Impact of       integrated soil fertility management practices on maize yield in Ethiopia. Soil and Tillage      Research227.

[2] Ananthi, T., Amanullah, M. M and Al-Tawaha, A. R. M. S. 2017. A review on maize-legume                                intercropping for enhancing the productivity and soil fertility for sustainable                                   agriculture in India. Advances in environmental biology. 11(5):49-64.

[3] Deepthi, V., Hema, B and Jyothi, V. 2014. A study on the adoption of the recommended       package of practices in Bt cotton by the farmers of Ranga Reddy district of Andhra         Pradesh.

[4] Garrett, E. H and Woodworth, R. S. 1969. Statistics in psychology and education. Vakils,       Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd. Bombay. 329.

[5] Himabindu, R., Kumar, T. S., Anjaiah, T., Naaiik, R. B. and Shashikala, T. 2022. Soil        fertility status of forage growing soils of Yadadri Bhuvanagiri district, Telangana.      The Pharma    Innovation Journal,11(8): 1312-1318.

[6] Mwakidoshi, E. R., Gitari, H. H., Muindi, E. M., Wamukota, A., Seleiman, M. F. and Maitra,   S.2023. Smallholder farmers’ knowledge of the use of bioslurry as a soil fertility amendment for potato production in Kenya. Land Degradation & Development.

[7] Vijayabhinandana, B., Asha, R and Kumar, B. G. 2022. Adaptation methods practiced by farmers in response to perceived climate change in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of    Extension Education. 58(2): 81-85.

[8] Wamalwa, S. W., Danga, Band Kwena, K. 2023.Integrated Soil Fertility Management             Prospects for Soil Productivity and Food Security in Machakos County. East African Agricultural    and Forestry Journal. 87(1 & 2):8-8.

[9] Yadav, K. K. and Sarkar, S. 2019. Biofertilizers, impact on soil fertility and crop productivity             under sustainable agriculture. Environment and Ecology37(1), 89-93.

Similar Posts